JDM Wheels on lancer .. Yes or no ?

or WDN Spec

skoda-2dwith-2dwooden-2dwheels-2d3.jpg
 
Bit too close for me lol

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhAPouqlcts&feature=player_profilepage[/youtube]
 
CEduced said:
p1170188.jpg

sunken (what tm is suggesting) ^^^

this reminds me of kids who put wide body evo kits on their lancers and keep the standart 17x7's or lower :p

flush ftw
 
that van isn't low enough to be honest.

I cbf with giving my opinion on wheels since it's already been said.
 
All looks gay to me. No aesthetic, performance (excessive camber), safety, economical, environmental or comfort appeal/benefit. Best look is when there is a uniform clearance all around the rim. If i had to choose.... excessive poke, then neg camber over excessive flush.

just my pinion.
 
cesario said:
CEduced said:
p1170188.jpg

sunken (what tm is suggesting) ^^^

this reminds me of kids who put wide body evo kits on their lancers and keep the standart 17x7's or lower :p

flush ftw

That be me with the proton lol, but it did have 19s and it did have 10mm spacers but still didnt sit flush in the guards

IMG_6854copy.jpg
 
Well i dont really want it to Poke our or be Sunken lol i was hopin they would sit flush cos im buying superlow king springs too :/

If i had 17s with superlow they should sit perfectly ? and also what rims should i be looking at for it to sit flush i was looking for XXR ? 1
 
diameter or 'what rims' have nothing to do with flushness.

it comes down to the following aspects
-camber
-wheel width
-offset
-tyre width
-flatness of guards.

8+20ish is about spot on.
 
oh i see Thanks for the help man ! hopefully when i get superlow kings springs it sits flush :( i hope so man i dont like it to poke or be sunken !
 
unclepaulie said:
diameter or 'what rims' have nothing to do with flushness.

it comes down to the following aspects
-camber
-wheel width
-offset
-tyre width
-flatness of guards.

8+20ish is about spot on.

8+20 on a mirage pokes, id assume its the same with a ce lancer
 
Back
Top